Legal Opinion

State v. Garland

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 12, 1998No. 1 CA-CR 97-0276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANKFORD, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Michael Garland (“Garland”) appeals the denial of his motion to sever the charges in the trial that resulted in his conviction for (1) the theft of property over $250, (2) dangerous kidnapping, (3) dangerous armed robbery, and (4) dangerous aggravated assault. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) sections 12-120.21(A)(1), 13-4031 and 13-4033(A). He received concurrent sentences of one and one-half years for the theft and thirteen and one-half years for each of the remaining convictions. Garland appeals…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. Martinez-VillarealArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. StuardArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. TerrazasArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AguilarArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. VigilCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Phx. City Prosecutor v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API