Legal Opinion

Casey v. Casey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1948No. 32405PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Herein Opal Casey sued Lester S. Casey for and obtained a divorce and decree setting apart to her certain property as her share of the estate accumulated during coverture and judgment for attorney’s fees and costs. Defendant appeals.

The only error complained of is directed against the court’s division of the property. The holding of the court is reflected in the following finding:

“ . . . there is certain property accumulated by the parties hereto, and that the same should be divided as follows: That the plaintiff, Opal Casey, shall take and have as her separate property all of the household…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Teel v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. CHILDERS v. CHILDERSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. Fletcher v. FletcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Allen v. AllenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Snelling v. SnellingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API