Legal Opinion
In re Omar L.
New York City Family Court
Decided August 5, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*520OPINION OF THE COURT
Paula J. Hepner, J.
Respondent filed an omnibus motion pursuant to sections 330.2, 332.1 (7) and section 332.2 of the Family Court Act seeking suppression (People v Huntley, 15 NY2d 72 [1965]) of a statement given by the respondent on the grounds that it was involuntarily made, without a knowing and intelligent waiver of the rights enunciated in Miranda v Arizona (384 US 436 [1966]). Respondent’s challenge is based upon his mother’s inability to serve as his adult representative and to exercise his constitutional rights due to a conflict of interest: (a) because the victim…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- In re Michelet P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In re James OO.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Lance BBNew York City Family Court · 2006
- Matter of Lance BBNew York Family Court, Chemung County · 2006