Legal Opinion

Muller v. Blue Diamond Growers

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided July 18, 2023No. 4:22-cv-00707Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION BETH PEACOCK MULLER, ) et al., individually and on behalf of ) all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 4:22 CV 707 RWS ) BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs Beth Peacock Muller, Thomas Fellin, and Michael Floyed bring this putative class action against Defendants Blue Diamond Growers and Does 1 through 10 on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, alleging that Defendants have engaged in deceptive marketing of Blue Diamond’s Smokehouse®…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Barbara Hager v. Arkansas Dept. of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  5. Gregory v. Dillard's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API