Legal Opinion

City of Corpus Christi v. Texas Driverless Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1945No. A-619PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simpson

The City of Corpus Christi contends that the Court of Civil Appeals erred (1) in holding invalid a provision of a city ordinance requiring in substance that those engaged in the business of renting “driverless automobiles” pay a license and inspection fee of $20.00 per automobile per year, the receipts to be expended in regulating the business so taxed; and (2) in holding invalid another provision of the ordinance which in effect requires those engaging in the business of renting “driverless automobiles” to post with the city an indemnity policy or cash or securities in lieu of one, “* * *…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Co. v. CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Ex Parte ParrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Russell Construction Co. v. PonderTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. City of Dalias v. GillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Doeppenschmidt v. City of New BraunfelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Payne v. MasseyTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Cabell's, Incorporated v. City of NacogdochesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Mildred L. Smith v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  5. Young v. City of SeagovilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API