De Jose v. De Jose
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Prior to the effective date of the Equitable Distribution Law (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B], eff July 19, 1980), the parties entered into a separation agreement which was intended to be a complete settlement of their property rights. Such an agreement is governed by the former statutory provisions and decisional law, and equitable distribution is not available (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [3]). Consequently, whether the "opting out” provisions of the Equitable Distribution Law were…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Cohen v. SeletskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Rubenfeld v. RubenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Pretterhofer v. PretterhoferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Stimmel v. StimmelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Roos v. RoosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.