Legal Opinion
Volozhinets v. DeHaven
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 20, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gammer, J.), dated September 15, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendants William T. DeHaven and Stephanie M. Forsman, and the separate motion of the defendant Arthur Volozhinets, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motions are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mariaca-Olmos v. MizrhyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Friedman v. U-Haul Truck RentalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Chaplin v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Flanagan v. HoegAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Boland v. Dig America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kearse v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Franca v. ParisiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Klimis v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Shin v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claude v. ClementsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.