Legal Opinion
Elliot v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided August 2, 1994No. 9317SC352, 9323SC718PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCRODDEN, Judge.
Upon motions of respondents, this Court has consolidated these appeals, both of which arise out of the Department of Human *615Resources’s (DHR’s) denial of medical assistance benefits (Medicaid) sought by petitioners. Respondents denied Medicaid benefits to petitioners because petitioners’ resources exceeded the allowable reserve limit. For a single person such as Mr. Casstevens, the applicable asset limit to receive Medicaid benefits through DHR is $1,500.00. N.C. Admin. Code tit. 10, r. 50B.0311(c) (August 1993). The asset limit for a two-person household, applicable to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schweiker v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atkins v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dillingham v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Duke University Medical Center v. BrutonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Joyner v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Pearson v. C.P. Buckner Steel Erection Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- County of Carteret v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.