Legal Opinion

Nesbitt v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2003No. SC S50078PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This ballot title review proceeding brought under ORS 250.085(2) concerns the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for a proposed initiative measure that the Secretary of State has denominated as Initiative Petition 22 (2004). The proposed measure, if adopted, would amend the Oregon Constitution by adding a section forbidding use “for a political purpose,” as the proposed measure defines that phrase, of money deducted from an employee’s paycheck, unless the employee consents to such use annually and in writing. The proposed measure contains definitions of certain of its terms, prescribes…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Caldeen Construction, LLC v. KempCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Terhune v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Caruthers v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Nesbitt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API