Legal Opinion
Gore Incorporated v. Glickman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1998No. 97-50047PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WERLEIN, District Judge:
The sole issue in this appeal is whether Plaintiff-Appellant Gore, Inc. is entitled to prejudgment interest on a refund it recovered in Gore, Inc. v. Espy, 87 F.3d 767 (5th Cir.1996) (“Gore I”). In “Gore I” this Court held that Gore was entitled to recover from the milk producer-settlement fund the sum of $366,772.28 in payments that Gore had made into that fund pursuant to an erroneous determination made by the Secretary of Agriculture. We now hold that Gore is also entitled to recover from the producer-settlement fund prejudgment interest on those payments, and we…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Maxxam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Scholz v. S.B. International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Davidson v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Chamberlain Ex Rel. Chamberlain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Margate Shipping Co. v. M/V JA OrgeronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.