Strickland v. Burlington Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that since the Industrial Commission made a finding of permanent disability, it should have also made findings regarding her loss of wage earning capacity under N.C.G.S. §§ 97-29 or 97-30 and then made an award. Often an award under N.C.G.S. § 97-29, and by implication N.C.G.S. § 97-30, better fulfills the policy of the Workers’ Compensation Act than an award under N.C.G.S. § 97-31(24), because it is a more favorable remedy and is more directly related to compensating a worker’s inability to work. West v. Bladenboro Cotton Mills, 62 N.C. App. 267, 302 S.E. 2d 645…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gupton v. Builders TransportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- West v. Bladenboro Cotton Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shaw v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Kenedy v. Workforce TempsNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002
- Lamb v. Hickory Springs Mfg. Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003
- Leigh v. Weyerhaeuser Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003
- MacKey v. Providence Designer HomesNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.