Legal Opinion
Murray v. Transit Commission
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 4, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Circuit Judge.
In addition to the suit which the Transit Commission has brought in the New York Supreme Court in the name and on behalf of the city of New York, the further prosecution of which has this day been enjoined, American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 11 F. Supp. 26, the Commission has brought a statutory proceeding in the state court in its own name against the Interborough Company and its receiver, pursuant to section 57 of the New York Public Service Law (Consol. Laws N. Y. c. 48), for a mandamus commanding the defendants therein to perform the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Missouri v. FiskeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Town of Springfield, Vermont v. McCarrenDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1982
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CavicchiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Cooper v. Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- BD. OF ELEC. LIGHT COM'RS OF BURLINGTON v. McCarrenDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1982
- Board of Electric Light Commissioners v. McCarrenDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1982