Legal Opinion
Petersen v. Fee International, Ltd.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 4, 1975No. Civ. 72-181PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs sued Fee International, Ltd., Resco, Ltd. and Harry J. Flewelling for patent infringement, false marking and unfair competition. A non-jury trial was conducted and on March 29, 1974 the Court found Plaintiffs to be the owners of U. S. Patent No. 3,555,939 (939); that ’939 is a valid patent; that Defendants’ “QualiKraft” FD-800 wrench infringes ’939; that Defendants were guilty of false marking; and that Defendants were guilty of unfair competition. The Court also found that Plaintiffs were entitled to a permanent injunction against the Defendants, their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Brunswick Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Outboard CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- J. I. Clark Company and John R. Clark v. Jones & Laughlin Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sloan v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Smith v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Wildfong v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Dow Chemical Co. v. CurtisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ben Franklin Hotel Associates v. Gilbert (In Re 815 Walnut Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.