Legal Opinion

In re Beauchamp

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 9, 1900No. 348PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

The facts in this case, briefly stated, are these: Henry O. Beauchamp and Elizabeth Iippincott, as in-, dividuals and as partners trading as Beauchamp & Co., were adjudicated bankrupts on February 3, 1900, upon their voluntary petition. The schedules filed with their petition show partnership assets and liabilities, but no individual assets; but the bankrupts, in their petition, claim the exemption provided by the Code of Public General Laws of Maryland (article 83, § 8), out of the proceeds of sale of said partnership assets. Milton D. Greenbaum, the trustee, converted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re LentzDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1899
  2. In re BoothroydDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1876
  3. In re PriceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1872
  4. In re HaferDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1868
  5. In re CorbettDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re DurhamDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1900
  2. Jennings v. William A. Stannus & SonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  3. Dixon v. KoplarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. Southern Irr. Co. v. Wharton Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Frost v. County of Santa Barbara (In Re Frost)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API