City of Chicago v. Pennsylvania Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
Writ oe Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Sheridan E. Fry, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cooke
The city of Chicago brought suit against the Pennsylvania Company in the municipal court to recover a penalty for failure to maintain lights in the subway over which the lines of said railroad cross Twenty-second street, in the city of Chicago. The city based its right to recover on section 1997 of its municipal code of 1905, which is as follows:
“1997. Lights at crossings.—Every person or corporation owning or operating any steam, elevated or street railway whose track or tracks cross or intersect at, above or below grade any of the streets within the city, shall, and they are hereby required…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ruhstrat v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- City of Chicago v. Chicago Union Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1902
- People ex rel. City of Chicago v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. HalbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Public Utilities Commission ex rel. Quincy Railway Co. v. City of QuincyIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Sanitary District v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- Union Traction Co. v. City of MuncieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Washington Terminal Co. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920
- Cohen v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925