Legal Opinion

Brown v. Sandeen Agency, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 23, 2008No. 2008AP464PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOVER, PJ.

¶ 1. Sandeen Agency, Inc., appeals an order granting summary judgment to Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota. Sandeen argues the circuit court erroneously concluded Tri-State was not obligated to pay a Minnesota worker's compensation claim under a policy issued to Wayne and Dianna Brown, d/b/a Sky High Crane Rental, Inc. (collectively, "Sky High"). Sandeen further alleges the court erroneously determined Sandeen was not Tri-State's agent. Sky High cross-appeals, also arguing the worker's compensation claim is covered under the policy, and challenging the part of the order…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State Bank of La Crosse v. ElsenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  4. Liebovich v. Minnesota InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Kozlik v. Gulf InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Andrea Townsend v. ChartSwap, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API