Solomon v. Wilmington Sewerage Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by B. Solomon and. others against the Wilmington Sewerage Company, beard by Judge B. B. Peebles, at Wilmington, March 24, 1903. Erom a judgment for the plaintiffs the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtOonnoe, J.
The plaintiffs allege that the defendant company was duly incorporated by the General Assembly of this State with authority to establish a system, of sewerage in the city of Wilmington, and to charge for the use of said sewers such reasonable sums as the board of directors should from time to time adopt, and with the authority to enforce the collection of such charges by severing the connection of such defaulting user with the main sewer. That pursuant to per-missicn granted by the city of Wilmington, the defendant laid its pipes and mains along' and under certain streets of said city upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griffin v. Goldsboro Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Heilig and Others v. . Stokes and PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co. v. McElweeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Lowe v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Purnell v. . DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1851
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Blackley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Halifax Paper Co. v. Roanoke Rapids Sanitary DistrictSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State ex rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. New Hope Road Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Antero & Lost Park Reservoir Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Atlantic Refining Company v. DudekSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932