Legal Opinion
Bey v. ACS
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 20, 2019No. 1:19-cv-03859Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BERNARD T. ANDERSON BEY, Plaintiff, 19-CV-3859 (CM) -against- ORDER TO AMEND ACS; GILIAN HUDSON; ABIGAIL FLOYD, Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff Bernard T. Anderson Bey, appearing pro se, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants are violating his constitutional rights. By order dated May 7, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.