Legal Opinion

Dominique Nelson, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals v. Reddit, Inc., a Delaware corporation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 14, 2026No. 3:25-cv-01470Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINIQUE NELSON, individually and Case No.: 25-CV-1470 JLS (AHG) on behalf of similarly situated individuals, 12 ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART Plaintiff, 13 AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY 14 PROCEEDINGS AND (2) REDDIT, INC., a Delaware corporation, 15 GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Defendant. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 16 17 (ECF Nos. 31, 31-1) 18 19 20 Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Stay (“Mot.,” ECF No. 31) and 21 supporting Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN,” ECF No. 31-1).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Dependable Highway Express, Inc. v. Navigators Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API