Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McKay v. Farmers & Stockmens Bank of Clayton

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1978No. 3146Published

1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge

(specially concurring).

I concur.

This is another of many summary judgments in which oral arguments and the court’s comments, if any, were not recorded. Findings of fact or reasons for rendering judgment are absent. Good memorandum briefs were filed. I compliment the attorney who can convince a trial judge of the righteousness of his cause though he is wrong. I also compliment the attorney who can appeal and convince an appellate court of the righteousness of his cause when he is right.

In summary judgment proceedings, the court should request opposing attorneys to submit findings of fact and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. FARMERS CO-OP. EL., INC., DUNCOMBE v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. Sheppard Federal Credit Union v. Michael A. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Edinburg v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Bowling Green, Inc. v. State Street Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  5. Eldon's Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API