Parkison v. Victor, Judge
Ohio Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceHunsicker, P. J.
I concur in the conclusion reached by my associates; however, I construe the order of the Court of Common Pleas as an attempt to exercise jurisdiction in prohibition.
“4. The vital distinction between ‘prohibition’ and ‘injunction’ is that injunction operates only upon individuals when used to require a desistance from prosecuting a suit or proceeding, while prohibition runs against the court to require a cessation from the exercise of jurisdiction.” Ferguson v. Ferguson, 98 S. W. (2d), 847.
See also: People, ex rel. Baldwin, v. Goldfogle, Justice, 30 N. Y. Supp., 296; State, ex rel. Radcliff,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Silliman v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Mattone v. ArgentinaOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Radcliff v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.