Legal Opinion

Flick v. Company.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County

Decided July 24, 1929Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fleming, P. J.,

— This is an action in replevin whereby the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant a Pontiac sedan. At the trial of the cause a non-suit was entered and the matter is now before the court on plaintiff’s motion to take off such non-suit.

The contention of the plaintiff, concisely stated, is that defendant warranted a certain Hudson brougham and that by reason of a breach of such warranty he is entitled to return the same and maintain a replevin for the recovery of the Pontiac sedan which had been given in part-payment for the Hudson. His contentions are based upon his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. TysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Miller v. ZanderNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  3. International Motor Co. v. OldfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  4. Yonker v. VaneerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API