Legal Opinion
Hartig Drug Co Inc v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 7, 2016No. 15-3289PublishedCited by 392 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JORDAN, Circuit Judge
This appeal arises from a putative class action in which Hartig Drug Company Inc. (“Hartig”) filed a complaint against Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (“Senju”), Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (“Kyorin”), and Allergan Inc. (“Allergan”) (collectively, the “Defendants”), alleging antitrust violations involving medicated eyedrops manufactured by the Defendants. Hartig argues that the Defendants’ wrongful suppression of generic competition resulted in supra-competitive pricing of those eyedrops. Although not a direct purchaser of the medications, Hartig…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by392 opinions
- St. Pierre v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Michael Simko v. United States Steel CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Wayne Land & Mineral Grp. LLC v. Del. River Basin Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Adam Potter v. Cozen & O'ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Mark Wallach v. Eaton CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
387 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.