Legal Opinion

Joffre v. Mynatt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1918No. 8017PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from District Oourt, Dallas County; Kenneth Foree, Judge. Action by Mrs. Berelia Mynatt against Mrs. Fannie Joffre. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, O. J.

Suit is by appellee to recover on a note alleged to have been executed by appellant and E. H. Joffre for $1,250 and payable to the order of W. O. Mynatt. A plea of non est factum was interposed by Mrs. Fannie Joffre denying signing said note. E. H. Joffre was alleged to be dead and his estate insolvent. A trial was had before a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered against Mrs. Fannie Joffre for the amount of the note, from which she appeals.

The only question we will consider is that the great weight and preponderance of the testimony is against the verdict and judgment,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Grand Fraternity v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Willis v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Zapp v. MichaelisTexas Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. M. H. Thomas Co. v. HawthorneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Dallas Hotel Co. v. NewbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Houston v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Blackwell v. Ship Channel Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API