Legal Opinion
United States v. Recticel Foam Corp.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided August 10, 1993No. Cr. 2-92-78PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MURRIAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This ease is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), for a report and recommendation regarding disposition by the District Court of all dispositive pretrial motions. The motion of defendant, Recticel Foam Corporation (“RFC”), to dismiss counts 1 through 12 on the ground that the materials described in the indictment do not constitute a hazardous waste [Doc. 122] is currently pending before this court. This matter came before the undersigned for an evidentiary hearing on Thursday, July 15, 1998. After considering…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Recticel Foam Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. Southern Union Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2009