Legal Opinion
United States v. Figuerola
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 6, 1995No. 93-50368PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM Opinion: Dissent by Judge BRUNETTI.
2Per curiam
The sureties on defendant Alfonso Figue-rola’s bail bond appeal the grant of the government’s motion for judgment on default. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
Figuerola was indicted and arrested for money laundering. A magistrate judge set bail at $150,000 in the form of a fully secured bond. Shortly thereafter, the United States Attorney and Figuerola’s lawyer stipulated to a $150,000 bond secured by the signatures of Figuerola’s wife of four months, her sister, and four of her friends, and by the home of two of these friends.1 The…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Jean NebbiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. William Richard MinorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Robert Jerome Skipper, Mrs. William E. McQuinn and Thomas H. Henderson, Iii, Sureties-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Diego Toro Adriana Toro, and Ralph T. Powell, Maria L. Powell, Sureties, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Frias-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- United States v. Noriega-SarabiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4861, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7952 United States of America v. Bertha Noriega-Sarabia, AKA Maria De Los Angeles Garcia-Salazar, and Dolores RoqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. FiguerolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995