Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Morgan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 10, 1989PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

The defendants, Rose and William Morgan, appeal from a judgment denying them recovery on their counterclaims in an action brought by the plaintiff, Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford Credit), to recover amounts due on an automobile instalment contract and to recover possession of the automobile covered thereby. We affirm the judgment.

The trial judge’s findings of fact made in conjunction with Ford Credit’s complaint and two counts of the counterclaim may be summarized as follows. On June 27, 1978, the Morgans purchased a new 1978 Mercury Zephyr automobile from Neponset Lincoln Mercury, Inc.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Michelin Tires (Canada) Ltd. v. First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  2. Home Savings Ass'n v. GuerraTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Thomas v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Tinker v. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Graves Equipment, Inc. v. M. DeMatteo Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Felde v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Lozada v. Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
  4. Patton v. McHoneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  5. Jaramillo v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API