Legal Opinion

People v. Baugh

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 2002No. Docket 225795PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

Before: Bandstra, C.J., and Neff and O’Connell, JJ. O’Connell, J.

This case is before us on remand from our Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of People v Glass (After Remand), 464 Mich 266; 627 NW2d 261 (2001). 465 Mich 863 (2001). In our first opinion, People v Baugh, 243 Mich App 1, 6; 620 NW2d 653 (2000), we concluded that where a defendant is indicted by a grand jury, the indictment does not constrain the magistrate’s subsequent bindover following a preliminary examination. However, in Glass, supra at 271, our Supreme Court ruled that a grand jury indictee does not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. GlassMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Glancy v. City of RosevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. PiaseckiMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Derek Joseph BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. People of Michigan v. Derek Joseph BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API