Legal Opinion

Roe v. Kervick

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 20, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

42 N.J. 191 (1964)

199 A.2d 834

ROBERT A. ROE, COMMISSIONER, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

JOHN A. KERVICK, STATE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 20, 1964.

Argued January 21, 1964.

Decided April 20, 1964.

Mr. Daniel Amster argued the cause for defendant-appellant.

Mr. Alan B. Handler, Deputy Attorney of New Jersey, argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.

This is a proceeding under N.J.S. 2A:16-50 et…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Harvey v. Essex County Board of FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Matter of N.Y. City H. Authority v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API