Legal Opinion

Woods v. Moffitt.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* [EDITORS' NOTE: FOOTNOTE * IS OMITTED FROM THE ORIGINAL COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT, THEREFORE IT IS NOT DISPLAYED IN THE ONLINE VERSION.]

1. — Pleading. Repugnancy in allegations of petition can be reached by demurrer to evidence.

2. — Same. Repugnancy in allegations of petition can be reached only by demurrer thereto or by motion to elect.

3. — Same. Where no objection is made to sufficiency of petition until after verdict, every reasonable intendment will be accorded petition in considering sufficiency thereof.

4. — Same. Objections to sufficiency of petition made after verdict are not favorably…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davidson v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Gude v. Weick Bros. Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  3. Gaty v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Garrett v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Stevens v. Westport Laundry Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Knorp v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Coleman v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Gover v. ClevelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Jenkins v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. Trump v. BallingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API