Legal Opinion
Mid-Continent Paper Converters, Inc. v. Brady, Ware & Schoenfeld, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 26, 1999No. 89A01-9810-CV-390PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Case Summary
Appellant-Defendant, Mid-Continent Paper Converters, Inc. (“Mid-Continent”), appeals from the judgment of the Wayne Circuit Court in favor of Appellee-Plaintiff, Brady, Ware & Schoenfeld (“Brady Ware”), on the dismissal of its counterclaim. We affirm that the fraud of Mid-Continent’s employee should be imputed to the company and its counterclaim is barred.
Issues
Mid-Continent raises several issues which we restate as follows:
I. Whether it was clearly erroneous for the trial court to find that the admitted fraud of Mid-Continent’s former vice president of finance,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Turoso v. Cleveland Municipal CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Yanoff v. MuncyIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Bud Wolf Chevrolet, Inc. v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- A.I. Credit Corporation v. Legion Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Allegheny Health Education v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- American Heritage Banco, Inc. v. McNaughtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Smith v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Kreighbaum v. First National Bank & TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.