Legal Opinion
Applied Innovations, Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 30, 1989No. Nos. 88-1072, 88-5052PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Applied Innovations, Inc. (defendant), appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the District of Minnesota, after a bench trial, in favor of the Regents of the University of Minnesota (the university) and National Computer Systems, Inc. (NCS) (together referred to as plaintiffs), finding that AI had infringed the university’s copyrights in a psychological test, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). Regents of University of Minnesota v. Applied Innovations, Inc., No. 3-86-CIV-683 (D.Minn. Oct. 9, 1987) (reported at 685 F.Supp.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Apple Computer, Inc., a California Corporation v. Franklin Computer Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wainwright Securities Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corporation and Richard A. HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Words & Data, Inc. v. GTE Communications Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991
- Roberts v. NorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007
- United States v. Washington Mint, LLC.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Hi-Tech Video Productions, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992
- Southco, Inc. v. Kanebridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.