Roberts v. Norris
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RICHARD G. KOPF, District Judge.
Presenting a fascinating “exhaustion” issue, this is a case brought by Karl Douglas Roberts (“Roberts”) under the federal ha-beas corpus statute. He seeks to avoid the death penalty. Roberts raises several arguments that he did not present to the Arkansas courts.
Impressed by the fact that Roberts suffered a serious injury to his brain (with a resultant loss of cerebral tissue) when he was a child, and applying Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 125 S.Ct. 1528, 161 L.Ed.2d 440 (2005), I have decided to grant Roberts’ motion to “stay and abey.” 1…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Karl D. Roberts v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Karl Roberts v. Dexter PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.