Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Norris

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided December 13, 2007No. Case 5:04CV00004PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD G. KOPF, District Judge.

Presenting a fascinating “exhaustion” issue, this is a case brought by Karl Douglas Roberts (“Roberts”) under the federal ha-beas corpus statute. He seeks to avoid the death penalty. Roberts raises several arguments that he did not present to the Arkansas courts.

Impressed by the fact that Roberts suffered a serious injury to his brain (with a resultant loss of cerebral tissue) when he was a child, and applying Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 125 S.Ct. 1528, 161 L.Ed.2d 440 (2005), I have decided to grant Roberts’ motion to “stay and abey.” 1…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Karl D. Roberts v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Karl Roberts v. Dexter PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  5. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API