Legal Opinion

State v. Luedtke

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 11, 2014No. 2013AP1737-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeubauer, P.J.

¶ 1. Michael R. Luedtke appeals from a judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his blood and an order denying his postconviction motion requesting dismissal of the charge or a new trial. Luedtke argues that the operating a motor vehicle with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in the blood statute, Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(am) (2011-12),1 is unconstitutional because it creates a strict liability criminal offense. Luedtke also argues that he was denied due process when the state destroyed his blood…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. MaloneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. Dale R. NeumannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Michael R. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Christopher Joseph AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. Jessica M. WeissingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. Jessica M. WeissingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Michael R. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API