Legal Opinion
Shane v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1989No. 87-3526PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, Greyhound maintenance workers, brought this wrongful discharge action against their employer, Greyhound Lines, after the employees’ union had already grieved the matter under the collective bargaining agreement and had accepted a settlement from Greyhound on their behalf. Appellants disapproved of the Union’s settlement because it did not expressly reserve their rights to bring further action against Greyhound. In this suit the employees seek damages for wrongful discharge under federal labor law and state tort and contract law. We affirm the district…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- David W. Jackson v. Southern California Gas Company Claudia Dodson Lois Durfee Mary Moore Jean Bish Betty Shattery Pat ShatteryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Ty, Inc. v. Gma Accessories, Inc. And Paul HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Angela Schlacter-Jones v. General Telephone of California Patricia Leathers Carol Todd Doug BartripCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Commodore v. University Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Milne Employees Ass'n v. Sun Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.