Richardson v. State National Bank
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 92. — SUIT FOR INJUNCTION BY THE STATE NATIONAL BANK AGAINST D. P. RICHARDSON, CITY TAX COLLECTOR, OF FRANKFORT. Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court. R. L. Stout, Circuit Judge. From a judgment granting the injunction, defendant appeals.
1Dissent
Dissenting opinion by
Judge B'arker.
I am unable to concur in the opinion of the court. If my only reasons for dissenting were those given in the dissenting opinion of Hager v. Citizens’ National Bank, 127 Ky. 192, 105 S. W. 403, I should not feel impelled now to dissent, but there are other and vital reasons why I cannot concur in the opinion, which I will state as briefly as I can. The opinion holds that the decision in that case is conclusive, or, at least, that there is no substantial difference between the two cases; and this idea runs through the whole opinion. The two cases are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Lawrence v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1895
- Chicago, St. Louis & N. O. Ry. Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Commonwealth v. LedmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.