Legal Opinion
Nickel v. Jackson
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 24, 1974No. Civ. 74-50-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion To Remand and Defendant’s Opposition thereto, the Court finds that the Motion should be denied.
Plaintiffs brought this suit in the District Court of Custer County, Oklahoma to cancel an oil and gas lease on land situated in said county. On January 11, 1974 Defendant timely removed this suit to this Court on the basis of diverse citizenship and the presence of the required jurisdictional amount. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiffs now move to remand on the premise that their suit did not involve the required…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wiley v. SinklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ronzio v. Denver & R. G. W. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Simons v. McDanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ellis v. Logan Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1982
- Bergstrom v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1995
- Stoltz, Wagner & Brown v. DuncanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
- Orndorff v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995