Legal Opinion

Glover v. NAT. BANK OF COMMERCE OF PINE BLUFF

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 3, 1975No. 75-123PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

On October 17, 1972, the appellant Glover and his partner Ferguson, who were in the meat-packing business, borrowed $20,000 from the appellee bank and gave a 90-day note for the debt. The partnership was not doing well. Two or three days before the note was due Glover informed an officer of the bank that Ferguson was buying Glover’s interest in the partnership (for $25,000 cash), that Ferguson was assuming all liabilities, and that Glover did not want the note extended and would not sign a renewal note. Some five months later Ferguson went bankrupt, his estate in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peoples State Bank v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Rush v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. MeltzerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. Worthen Bank & Trust Co., N.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. North Bank v. Circle Investment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Mechanics National Bank of Worcester v. ShearMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Ward v. Worthen Bank & Trust Co., N.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API