Legal Opinion

Grasper v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1978No. 277 Misc. DocketPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Paul Gasper (petitioner) has filed an “Action in Mandamus,” which we have treated as a petition for review pursuant to the Pennsylvania Buies of Appellate Procedure, and to which the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) has filed an answer including new matter and the certificate of the Chairman of the Board required pursuant to Section 8 of the Act of August 6, 1941, P.L. 861, as amended, 61 P.S. §331.8. The petitioner has also filed a reply to the new matter, and now before us are the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment and the Board’s cross-motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Henderson v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fleegle v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Lantzy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Cunningham v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. Hebel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County1991
  5. Commonwealth v. Williams, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API