Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Patterson v. City of Youngstown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1984No. 82-1774PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether Section 163.10 of the Youngstown City Ordinances requires an employee to reimburse the city for wages paid as injured-on-duty leave if the employee recovers lost wages in a settlement or judgment against a third party.

Section 163.10 provides in part:

“All regular full-time salaried or hourly rated employees of the City injured and incapacitated in the actual discharge of their duty, who as a result thereof, are compelled to be absent from duty, shall be entitled to leave of absence with pay subject to the following .conditions:
*9“(c) Employee…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FotiOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. State v. SchwambergerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Adair v. City of NortonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API