Legal Opinion

Buff v. Carter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 16, 1985No. 8520DC202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court made findings of fact sufficient to support its judgment ordering defendant to pay prospective child support and arrearages. We hold that it did not.

In Coble v. Coble, 300 N.C. 708, 268 S.E. 2d 185 (1980), our Supreme Court set out what conclusions of law and findings of fact a trial judge must make in order to warrant an order compelling a party to share in the financial responsibility of child support. Applying G.S. 5043.4(c), the court stated that:

[A]n order for child support must be based upon the interplay of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Steele v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Hicks v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Savani v. SavaniCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Brandt v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Savani v. SavaniCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API