Legal Opinion
Sandner, Inc. v. Centennial Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 19, 1988No. 77020, 77021PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
Sandner, Inc. brought suit against Bayley, Martin and Fay (BMF), its insurance agency, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract, and negligence in failing to procure workers’ compensation insurance for the company. BMF answered denying liability, and filed a third-party complaint against Centennial Insurance Company (Centennial). Sandner’s motion to add Centennial as a defendant was then granted, and Sandner alleged theories of recovery against Centennial based on negligence and breach of an alleged oral contract to provide retroactive workers’ compensation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wright Body Works, Inc. v. Columbus Interstate Insurance AgencySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Ethridge v. Associated Mutuals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- King v. BrasingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Sargent v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Adams v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McClure v. GowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Sandner, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Wilder v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- American Resources Insurance v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Centennial Insurance v. Sandner, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.