Legal Opinion

Sears-Roebuck & Co. v. Starnes

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Special Justice Albeet Williams,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarded under the Workmen’s Compensation Act and by apt assignments presents three questions:

1. Was the trial court warranted in holding that the appellant came within the application of the Compensation Act, there being no direct proof offered to establish the allegation that it employed as many as five persons?

2. Was the employee’s injury compensable?

3. Were the circumstances of the ease properly held to have excused the employee from giving the written notice directed by the statute?

We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HayTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Meade-Fiber Corp. v. StarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Bystrom Bros. v. JacobsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Central Motor Express, Inc. v. BurneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Benjamin F. Shaw Co. v. MusgraveTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Atlas Coal Corporation v. ScalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Seymour & Sage v. LewisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1861
  5. Oregon Iron Co. v. TrullengerMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API