Legal Opinion

P. M. Lattner Manufacturing Co. v. Higgins

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 16, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The one matter of complaint by the appellant is that the trial court had no power to reassemble the jury after its discharge, or to receive their affidavits in support of a claim of alleged mistake, or to correct the alleged mistake, even though it were shown by the highest degree of proof.

That the court has power to reassemble a jury, even after it has rendered a sealed verdict, and has been discharged, and to permit a showing thereby that, through inadvertence or clerical error, the verdict rendered does not in form express the real verdict reached by the jury in its deliberations, has been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Dalrymple v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Hodgkins v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Wolfgram v. Town of SchoepkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Matthys v. DonelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cyr v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Clark v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Rutledge v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Prendergast v. Smith Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API