Legal Opinion

National-Ben Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Snider

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 30, 1930No. 6 Div. 525PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J. •

The trial was had upon count 1 in Code form, to recover damages for fire loss.

Defendant’s pleas'were based on certain alleged breaches of material provisions of the policy on plaintiff’s stock of merchandise furniture, and fixtures; the insurance being, respectively, $1,000 on merchandise and $300 on fixtures.

The provisions of policies of fire insurance for making and preserving inventories and books under the iron-safe clause are well understood, are reasonable, and intended to be effective for the prevention of fraud and a breach of contract. Penn. Fire Ins. Co. v. Malone, 217…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Southern States Fire Ins. v. KronenbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Georgia Home Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Girard Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Georgia Home Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deal v. Camden Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API