National-Ben Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Snider
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, J. •
The trial was had upon count 1 in Code form, to recover damages for fire loss.
Defendant’s pleas'were based on certain alleged breaches of material provisions of the policy on plaintiff’s stock of merchandise furniture, and fixtures; the insurance being, respectively, $1,000 on merchandise and $300 on fixtures.
The provisions of policies of fire insurance for making and preserving inventories and books under the iron-safe clause are well understood, are reasonable, and intended to be effective for the prevention of fraud and a breach of contract. Penn. Fire Ins. Co. v. Malone, 217…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Southern States Fire Ins. v. KronenbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Georgia Home Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Girard Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Georgia Home Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Deal v. Camden Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935