Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Emerald Coal & Coke Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 8, 1943PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, Vice-Chancellor:

Complainants ask that costs be taxed against respondent, notwithstanding that the bill must be dismissed. They contend that the awarding of costs is within the discretion of the Court of Chancery, and that such discretion should be exercised in their favor under the facts of this case.

The statute relating to costs in equity, Revised Code of Delaware (1935), Section 4907, provides that “A Court of Equity, * * * shall make such order concerning costs in every case as shall be agreeable to equity.” This is in harmony with the familiar doctrine that the taxing of costs is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kingston v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1917
  2. Scully v. Automobile Finance Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
  3. Old Time Petroleum Co. v. TurcolCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  4. Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  5. Wolcott v. DoremusCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Science Accessories Corp. v. Summagraphics Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  2. In Re CarusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. In re First Account of Equitable Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
  4. Bodley v. JonesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1948
  5. Brady v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API