Legal Opinion

Dowell v. Griffin

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 17, 2011No. 09cv2576-DMS (MDD)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY OF PERSONNEL FILES [DOC. NO. 46]

MITCHELL D. DEMBIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On November 10, 2009, Donald Dowell (“Plaintiff’), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 asserting that his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional rights were violated during a search of his person and residence. (Doc. No. 1). On April 25, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Discovery of Police or Custodial Officer Conduct (Pitchess…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  3. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  5. Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. (PC) Calloway v. NievesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. Black v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  4. Briggs v. YiDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
  5. Ingrande v. Autozoners, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API