Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Mills

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1939No. 8837Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKenNA, Judge

I regret my failure to be in accord with the views expressed in the majority opinion.

Code, 48-8-1, together with that part of Code, 48-7-1, to be read with it, is a penal statute to be strictly construed. Hall v. Norfolk & W. R. Co., 44 W. Va. 36, 28 S. E. 754, 41 L. R. A. 669, 67 Am. St. Rep. 757; Diddle v. Continental Casualty Co., 65 W. Va. 170, 63 S. E. 962, 22 L. R. A. (N. S.) 779. As to the nature and purpose of Code. 48-8-1, see also, Clifton v. Clifton, 83 W. Va. 149, 152, 98 S. E. 72; and Davis v. Prunty, 114 W. Va. 285, 286, 171 S. E. 644. It is to be supposed that the opinions of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. HoultWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Diddle v. Continental Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hall v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Clifton v. CliftonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API