State v. Mills
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKenNA, Judge
I regret my failure to be in accord with the views expressed in the majority opinion.
Code, 48-8-1, together with that part of Code, 48-7-1, to be read with it, is a penal statute to be strictly construed. Hall v. Norfolk & W. R. Co., 44 W. Va. 36, 28 S. E. 754, 41 L. R. A. 669, 67 Am. St. Rep. 757; Diddle v. Continental Casualty Co., 65 W. Va. 170, 63 S. E. 962, 22 L. R. A. (N. S.) 779. As to the nature and purpose of Code. 48-8-1, see also, Clifton v. Clifton, 83 W. Va. 149, 152, 98 S. E. 72; and Davis v. Prunty, 114 W. Va. 285, 286, 171 S. E. 644. It is to be supposed that the opinions of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. HoultWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
- Diddle v. Continental Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hall v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
- Clifton v. CliftonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.