Legal Opinion

Hall v. Norfolk & W. R.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1897PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Mercer County. Action by one Hall against the Norfolk and Western Railroad Company. Plaintiff had judgment. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Beannon, Judge:

Hall brought an action of debt against the Norfolk and *37Western Railroad Company to recover the fixed penalty of five hundred dollars imposed upon railroads'by clause 5, .chapter 54, s. 83, Code 1891, for overcharge of rates, and recovered judgment, and the company sued out this writ of error. The first question of decisive importance is whether the act of the conductor in making the alleged overcharge binds the company, in the absence of evidence that it was ordered or ratified by it. It is clear that the principal is liable for a tort done by its agent, in an action for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gregory's Adm'r v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Woolverton v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gillingham v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  5. State v. B. & O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Farish & Co. v. ReigleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  2. State Ex Rel. Crutcher v. KoelnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Koontz v. Board of Park Commissioners of City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State ex rel. Burt v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Diddle v. Continental Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API