Legal Opinion

People v. Manoharan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 21, 2009No. 4-08-0883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

In December 2006, defendant, Ramkumar Manoharan, offered to plead guilty to two counts of delivering a controlled substance within 1.000 feet of a school (720 ILCS 570/407(b)(2) (West 2006)). After admonishing defendant pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 402 (177 Ill. 2d R. 402), the trial court accepted his guilty plea, sentenced him to two concurrent six-year prison terms, and recommended that defendant be considered for impact incarceration under section 5 — 8— 1.1 of the Unified Code of Corrections (Unified Code) (730 ILCS 5/5— 8 — 1.1 (West 2006)).

Defendant appeals, arguing that (1) the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. ColonIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. JosephIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. People v. CunninghamAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. People v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  4. People v. BurgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  5. People v. BurgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API